Friday, May 31, 2019

The Ultimate Fulfillment in Mans Fate by Andre Malraux Essay -- Mans

The Ultimate Fulfillment in Mans Fate In Mans Fate, Andre Malraux examines the induce forces that lead individuals to join a great cause. Forced into a life of contempt, Chen portrays the man of action in the early phases of the Chinese Revolution. He dedicates himself to the communist cause. It is something greater than himself, a phenomenal concept that he has fused into. It is something for which he will give his life. How did this devotion come about? A combination of his personality, his interior life, as well as societys influence, molded him into a terrorist. Chen is self-destructive he is controlled by his religion of terrorism and his fascination with death. He is representative of the dedicated soldier who begins as a sacrificial priest (4) and ends as a martyr. After all, the ideologies of communism and terrorism were practically a religion to those involved in the revolution. An examination of Chens preceding(a) gives us an idea of how he formed his beliefs, and fel l into a state of isolation. At an early date, his parents were murdered in the pillage of Kalagan. In addition, at age twenty-four, his uncle was taken hostage and killed because he couldnt afford the ransom, and with no wife or children he was severed from any attachment to a family. He was practically brought up by pastor Smithson, representative of the thousands of Christians that were present in Shanghai, who gave him his Christian education. However, as he was devoid of charity, a religious calling could lead him only to contemplation or the inner life but he hated contemplation and would only have dreamt of an apostleship, for which precisely his absence of charity disqualified him (64). Thus, he was u... ...reams which take ownership of us because we give them force, but which we can just as easily deny (180). This is further reinforced by Chens idea that In the last second I have felt nothing of what used to weigh on me (192). Chen is the terrorist for the insurrection. His faith had isolated himself from the world instead of submitting to it. We have a personal shoot for connection, Chen is isolated until the end, when all differences are subsumed. Communism gives a sense of escaping isolation. For under this ideology there is a personal connection and a feeling of equality. It is the last fulfillment to live his idea, and more importantly to die for his cause - a cause that is much greater than the individual. In the end Chen becomes the bomb. Bibliography Malraux, Andre. Mans Fate La learn Humaine. New York Vintage Books. 1990

Thursday, May 30, 2019

Greek Tragedy Exemplified in Shakespeares Hamlet Essay -- Shakespeare

Greek Tragedy Exemplified in Shakespe ares Hamlet For s perpetuallyal thousands of years, drama has existed among mankind. The antiquated Greeks are accredited with the creation of drama, which began as simple religious rituals and eventu all(prenominal)y evolved into the more complex forms of tragedies and comedies. The first rules of drama, not surprisingly, were also written by a Greek--the famous philosopher and intellectual, Aristotle. Aristotle took note of the what qualities created a successful dramatic piece by observing a plethora of plays written by different Greek dramatists. As a result of what he observed, Aristotle compiled a set of guidelines to define the perfect tragedy. So influential, thorough, and well crafted were his writings that many poets and playwrights since have patterned their own whole kit and boodle after them. Aristotle noted six basic requirements for a good tragedy--plot, character, diction, thought, spectacle, and song. The most important of all o f these is obviously the plot. The plot needs to have a beginning, which doesnt of necessity follow any event a middle, which follows the beginning and causes the ending and of course the finale, which is caused by the middle and does not itself cause any other event. Common sense, therefore, dictates that all of the acts need to be skillfully woven into one another instead of each act abruptly starting and abruptly ending. The last need of a good plot is the incorporation of situation reversals and scenes of recognition. These are almost always the most powerful parts of any good plot, as they invoke mad interest in the viewer. Character is the next most important aspect of the perfect tragedy after the plot. Every tragedy needs to contain a tragic hero. A complete vil... ...oetic form of all of Shakespeares plays is always well crafted and problems with wording are nonexistent. Hamlet also contains some of the most famous soliloquies that Shakespeare ever wrote. Hamlets to be o r not to be speech is probably one of Shakespeares best known speeches outside of Mark Antonys friends, Romans, county men, lend me your ears speech from Julius Caesar. Elements of song are also found in this play through the character Ophelia when she is in her maddened state. Hamlet is most definitely a shining example of an saint tragedy. Its plot, characters, and wording are all masterfully crafted. It is well thought out and flows smoothly. William Shakespeare has truly embraced Aristotles idea of the perfect tragedy through his own Hamlet, Prince of Denmark.Works CitedShakespeare, William. Hamlet. spherical Shakespeare Theatre Series. 1996.

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

Authorship debate Essay -- essays research papers

William Shakespeares works being just that is a smell most accept however, there has been a lot of evidence and arguments by historians, who opt to challenge this notion, arguing that Shakespeare was the pen name of Edward de Vere, the Earl of Oxford had to conceal his authorship for accessible and political reasons. After careful examination of historians evidence this theory doesnt measure up and it was indeed Shakespeare, who was the genuine author.The world has contend to accept that William Shakespeare was born in Stratford-upon-Avon, England, during the year of 1564. The register of Holy trinity, the parish church in Stratford, records his baptism on April 26. According to the custom at the time, infants were baptized about terce days after their birth. Williams father was a glover, trader, and landowner who married Mary Arden, the daughter of an affluent landowner of Wilmcote. therefore, the generally accepted date for Shakespeares birth is April 23 (World Book 344). Joh n Shakespeare, Williams father rose by election to the position of Alderman in 1565 and in 1568 he was elected Bailiff, the equivalent to mayor (Reedy & Kathman). Its believed that because Williams father was a town official, the young William was entitled to a free education at the Kings school. It has been accepted for the most part that William Shakespeare attended the Stratford grammar school. The Stratford grammar school brisk students for the university however there is no evidence that William ever attended a university. The reason being is when William Shakespeare was thirteen his father suffered business losses. William was pulled from school and apprenticed to a trade, not an uncommon occurrence during the Elizabethan Age.William Shakespeare married Ann Hathaway in November 1582 at the age of eighteen. Anne was twenty-six. It would only be six months later that their daughter, Susanna was born. William also had a placed of twins in February 1585. Between the years of 158 5-1590, Shakespeare disappeared. We considered these years as his lost years mainly because there has yet to be found whatsoever musical accompaniment or know whereabouts of him.Its accepted that Shakespeare was in London by 1590 working as an actor and playwright. Approximately for twenty-three years he was a workin... ... died too early to convey been the real Shakespeare (Michell 171). Oxford did not leave a will. If he were to stomach left a will, Oxfordians and Anti-Strafordians would have no doubt have more weight to their theory, thats if his will contained Shakespeare plays and sonnets. The 17th Earl of Oxford was a recognized poet in his day, and the Oxfordians make the most of this in their attempts to prove that he wrote the works of Shakespeare. There is evidence presented about his reputation in actual context of the times and shows that while Oxford work had some admirers, but dont all authors have some admirers, nobody seems to have considered him a great poet or playwright. Belief in the Oxfordian story that Shakespeares works were written not by Shakespeare but by the seventeenth Earl of Oxford requires not merely suspending the rules of evidence that would normally be used to establish the authorship of a body of work, but also accepting a set of Oxfordian myths -- tales that are presented as fact but that research shows are simply not true. Some of these myths have been repeated and handed down from Oxfordian to Oxfordian for decades, without any attempt being made to verify them